IT認証試験問題集
毎月、ITshikenは1500人以上の受験者が試験準備を助けて、試験に合格するために受験者にご協力します
 ホームページ / JN0-633 問題集  / JN0-633 問題練習

Juniper JN0-633 問題練習

Security, Professional (JNCIP-SEC) 試験

最新更新時間: 2019/05/15,合計338問。

平成から令和へ:JN0-633 最新真題を買う時、日本語版と英語版両方を同時に獲得できます。

実際の問題集を練習し、試験のポイントを了解し、テストに申し込むするかどうかを決めることができます。

さらに試験準備時間の35%を節約するには、JN0-633 問題集を使用してください。

 / 23

Question No : 1
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
Based on the output shown in the exhibit, what are two results? (Choose two.)

正解:

Question No : 2
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
You must configure two SRX devices to enable bidirectional communications between the two networks shown in the exhibit. You have been allocated the 172.16.1.0/24 and 172.16.2.0/24 networks to use for this purpose.
Which configuration will accomplish this task?

正解:

Question No : 3
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
Referring to the topology shown in the exhibit, which two configuration tasks will allow Host A to telnet to the public IP address associated with Server B? (Choose two.)

正解:

Question No : 4
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
You are asked to implement NAT to translate addresses between the IPv4 and IPv6 networks shown in the exhibit.
What are three configuration requirements? (Choose three.)

正解:

Question No : 5
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
Host A cannot resolve the www.target.host.com Web page when using its configured DNS server. As shown in the exhibit, Host A's configured DNS server and the Web server hosting the www.target.host.com Web page are in the same subnet. You have verified bidirectional reachability between Host A and the Web server hosting the Web page.
What would cause this behavior on the SRX device in Company B's network?

正解:

Question No : 6
19.1.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:00:11
> via ge-0/0/1.0

[edit]
[email protected]# show routing-instances
fbf {
routing-options {
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.19.1.2;
}
}
}

[edit]
[email protected]# show routing-options
interface-routes {
rib-group inet fbf-int;
}
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 172.18.1.1;
}
rib-groups {
fbf-int {
import-rib [ inet.0 fbf.inet.0 ];
import-policy fbf-pol;
}
}

[edit]
[email protected]# show policy-options policy-statement fbf-pol
term 1 {
from interface ge-0/0/1.0;
to rib fbf.inet.0;
then accept;
}
term 2 {
then reject;
}
-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, you notice that filter-based forwarding is not working.
What is the reason for this behavior?

正解:

Question No : 7
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
In the network shown in the exhibit, you want to forward traffic from the employees to ISP1 and ISP2. You want to forward all Web traffic to ISP1 and all other traffic to ISP2. However, your configuration is not producing the expected results. Part of the configuration is shown in the exhibit. When you run the show route table isp1 command, you do not see the default route listed.
What is causing this behavior?

正解:

Question No : 8
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
In the network shown in the exhibit, you want to forward traffic from the employees to ISP1 and ISP2. You want to forward all Web traffic to ISP1 and all other traffic to ISP2. While troubleshooting, you change your filter to forward all traffic to ISP1. However, no traffic is sent to ISP1.
What is causing this behavior?

正解:

Question No : 9
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, which feature allows the hosts in the Trust and DMZ zones to route to either ISP, based on source address?

正解:

Question No : 10
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
TCP traffic sourced from Host A destined for Host B is being redirected using filter-based forwarding to use the Red network. However, return traffic from Host B destined for Host A is using the Blue network and getting dropped by the SRX device.
Which action will resolve the issue?

正解:

Question No : 11
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit --
[email protected]< show route summary
Router ID.
inet.0: 3 destinations, 3 routes (3 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 1 routes, 1 active
Local: 1 routes, 1 active
StatiC. 1 routes, 1 active
customer-A.inet.0: 3 destinations, 3 routes (3 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 1 routes, 1 active
Local: 1 routes, 1 active
StatiC. 1 routes, 1 active
customer-B.inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 1 routes, 1 active
Local: 1 routes, 1 active
OSPF. 1 routes, 1 active
StatiC. 1 routes, 1 active
customer-B.inet6.0: 5 destinations, 5 routes (5 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
Direct: 2 routes, 2 active
Local: 2 routes, 2 active
StatiC. 1 routes, 1 active
-- Exhibit --
In the output, how many user-configured routing instances have active routes?
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4

正解: B

Question No : 12
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, the application firewall configuration fails to commit.
What must you do to allow the configuration to commit?

正解:

Question No : 13
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, the session close log was generated by the application firewall rule set HTTP.
Why did the session close?

正解:

Question No : 14
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
You have been asked to block YouTube video streaming for internal users. You have implemented the configuration shown in the exhibit, however users are still able to stream videos.
What must be modified to correct the problem?

正解:

Question No : 15
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit C



-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, AppTrack is only logging the session closure messages for sessions that last 1 to 3 minutes.
What is causing this behavior?

正解:

 / 23